August 26, 2013 – When Should We Double Partscores?
The short answer to my title question, at IMPs, is never. Read the rest of this entry »
|
|||||||||||
Bloom Bridge Blog — Triple-B |
|||||||||||
August 26, 2013 – When Should We Double Partscores?
August 27th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ 1 Comment
The short answer to my title question, at IMPs, is never. Read the rest of this entry » August 21, 2013
August 22nd, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ 1 Comment
Hi, everyone. I have been moved to your group this week. I am Steven Bloom, and love to write about and analyze bridge hands. I am a retired mathematician, and spend much of my time these days writing for the Junior program, for http://www.bridgewinners.com, and for http://www.DoubleDummy.net. Please, check out those sites if you haven’t already. Each week, I will pick a few hands from Sunday’s session, and focus on the card-play. Read the rest of this entry » July 29, 2013
July 30th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ 1 Comment
Let’s continue with our suit combination theme: Try both of these club suits. N
North
♠
—
♥
—
♦
—
♣
AJ643
S
South
♠
—
♥
—
♦
—
♣
Q52
and N
North
♠
—
♥
—
♦
—
♣
AJ643
S
South
♠
—
♥
—
♦
—
♣
Q92
In both cases, find the best line to win four tricks, and the best line to win all five tricks. July 22, 2013 – Tempo
July 23rd, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ 2 Comments
I haven’t given you any suit combinations in a while. Time for another: This is your spade suit, N
North
♠
A754
♥
—
♦
—
♣
—
S
South
♠
Q1098
♥
—
♦
—
♣
—
For that you need a miracle. Suppose you only need three winners, what is the percentage play? July 16, 2013 – Am I Good Enough to Pull Off a Squeeze?
July 17th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ No Comments
Squeeze play, to many, is the hardest element to master in bridge. My wife, and regular partner, swears that she cannot play a squeeze. Still, I have seen her land 100’s of contracts via a squeeze, and the later conversation always goes like this: Steve: Nicely played. I thought you didn’t do squeezes. Betty: I don’t. I lucked into it. Besides, the cards were marked, so the play was easy. That last is the real key – most squeezes are no different than any other aspect of declarer play – they involve counting, placing cards, keeping track of the cards played, and picturing the ending. Can you pull one off? Yep. July 7, 2013
July 9th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ 2 Comments
The play has been pretty strong for a couple of weeks, so we were due for a letdown, and so it was. The play was quite off last night. That might be because of the unfamiliar board-a-match format, or the head up competition, but our squad got killed, and earned most of the losses. Read the rest of this entry » July 1, 2013 – Where’s Perry Mason When We Need Him?
July 2nd, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ No Comments
Before getting into the card play from last night, I want to make one bidding observation – successful contracts depend on both high card power and on shape. June 24, 2013 – Is Down One Good Bridge?
June 25th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ 4 Comments
There is another bridge adage – down one is good bridge. What does that mean? Well, as you know, at IMPs, the odds favor bidding games fairly aggressively. In a strong match, both teams will bid game contracts that are marginal, and, if the defense is sharp, many of these will be set. So, when a number of thin games are bid, and set, the standard of play seems to be high – down a trick, high level bridge. Read the rest of this entry » June 17, 2013 – IMP Odds
June 18th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ No Comments
The boards last night were pretty quiet, which is just as well, since I am tired from a long tournament, and couldn’t say a lot even if the hands were lively. I thought I would focus a bit on IMP odds today. In the KO tactics handout, you were told to bid fairly aggressively for games, bidding vulnerable games with at least a 40% chance, and 50% non-vulnerable games, but to bid more conservatively in the slam zone. Good advice. Every wonder why? Read the rest of this entry » June 10, 2013
June 11th, 2013 ~ Steve Bloom ~ No Comments
The play last night was strong, leaving me little to carp about. I’ll focus on two defensive positions. On the first, board 7, West held West
♠
AQ1094
♥
4
♦
75
♣
98763
The auction went, with both sides vulnerable: W
West
N
North
E
East
S
South
—
—
—
Pass
Pass
1♣
Pass
1♠
Pass
2♥
Pass
2NT
Pass
3NT
All Pass
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||